Origin of the Cooma Granite

  Though Munksgaard (1988) found that chemically a mixture of subequal amounts of high-grade metapelite and metapsammite could produce the Cooma Granodiorite, our work has shown that the first (syn-D3) melting occurs only in the calcium-poor metapelites, producing plagioclase-free magmas with compositions unlike that of the granodiorite. The fact that the incipient intrusions of granitic material (metapsammite leucosome) resembling the Cooma Granodiorite have disaggregated leucosomes in Snake Creek, implies that this granitic material post-dates the partial melting responsible for the leucosomes. In contrast to the metapelite leucosomes, this leucosome is rich in plagioclase, as is the Cooma Granodiorite. If this late intrusive material can be related to the Cooma Granodiorite (requiring more mineralogical and chemical work to be certain of the correlation), the Cooma Granodiorite cannot be regarded as a product of in situ partial melting of the adjacent metapelitic rocks. Though in situ melting of quartzofeldspathic rocks appears to have produced some leucosome of potentially suitable composition, the locally abundant volumes of Cooma Granodiorite appear to support the suggestion of Vallance (1969, p. 185) that the granodiorite magma has moved away from its source-rocks, even if only for a small distance.

Munksgaard (1988) suggested that water-rich fluid was involved in the formation of the Cooma Granodiorite, because it has slightly, but consistently lower d18O values than the adjacent metasediments. This is supported by evidence of water access into the rocks of Snake Creek, producing coarse-grained, strongly foliated, retrograde mica schists and pegmatite. It remains to be determined whether or not this water correlates with the formation of plagioclase-bearing leucosome and intrusion of the Cooma Granodiorite late in the history of the Cooma Complex.

 
Previous Section Home Next Section